home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!sliver.demon.co.uk
- From: Mark <mark@sliver.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,demon.tech.amiga
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,demon.tech.amiga
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 96 23:14:30 GMT
- Message-ID: <9602032314.AA0058e@sliver.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4et222$r4g@infa.central.susx.ac.uk> <1219.6606T1078T2951@crl.com>
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sliver.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL3]
- X-Mail2News-Path: relay-4.mail.demon.net!post.demon.co.uk!sliver.demon.co.uk
-
- Joseph Waldvogel (joewald@crl.com) wrote:
- : The A600 was a Usless AMIGA! One of many commodore Stuppied Idea's.
- : Add the A600 to the list with C-16 and plus-4, probley the C-128D
- : also. Hell a CD32 is much more Useful then the A600 ever was.
- : The time they wasted developing these Lame systems could have been
- : better spent, Oh I don't know, maybe getting the AAA chipset out
- : the door?
-
- It can't be that useless, I'm using an A600 right now and it does
- lots of useful things for me. Let's face it, the A1200 never came
- with a battery backed clock, talk about useless!
-
- If I "upgrade" by selling, I'll be passing on my "problem" computer
- to someone else. Think about it.
-
- It's neat, it's compact, I love my A600.
-